| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Hortaliças. |
|
Data corrente: |
11/03/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
07/08/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Folder/Folheto/Cartilha |
|
Autoria: |
TOMITA, C.; RESENDE, F. V.; CLEMENTE, F. M. V. T.; AMARO, G. B.; SOUZA, R. B. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
C. TOMITA.; FRANCISCO VILELA RESENDE, CNPH; FLAVIA MARIA VIEIRA TEIXEIRA CLEMEN, CNPH; GEOVANI BERNARDO AMARO, CNPH; RONESSA BARTOLOMEU DE SOUZA, CNPH. |
|
Título: |
Biofertilizante: aprenda como se faz. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2007 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brasília, DF: Embrapa Hortaliças, 2007. |
|
Páginas: |
8 p. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Controle de doença. |
|
Thesagro: |
Adubo Orgânico; Biofertilizante; Formulação; Inseto; Mistura. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/102912/1/biofertilizante.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00587nam a2200229 a 4500
001 1780991
005 2017-08-07
008 2007 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aTOMITA, C.
245 $aBiofertilizante$baprenda como se faz.
260 $aBrasília, DF: Embrapa Hortaliças$c2007
300 $a8 p.
650 $aAdubo Orgânico
650 $aBiofertilizante
650 $aFormulação
650 $aInseto
650 $aMistura
653 $aControle de doença
700 1 $aRESENDE, F. V.
700 1 $aCLEMENTE, F. M. V. T.
700 1 $aAMARO, G. B.
700 1 $aSOUZA, R. B. de
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Hortaliças (CNPH) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cppse.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
01/08/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
12/07/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
DOREAU, M.; PALHARES, J. C. P.; CORSON, M. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
Unité Mixte de Recherches sur les Herbivores, INRA/VetAgro Sup, 63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France; JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; INRA, UMR1069 Sol Agro et hydrosystème Spatialisation, F-35000 Rennes, France. |
|
Título: |
Water consumption by livestock: how to calculate and optimize its use. Focus on Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: ANNUAL MEETING BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 50., 2013, Campinas. The integration of Knowledge in animal production - Palestra. Campinas: SBZ, 2013 |
|
Descrição Física: |
1 CD-ROM |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Water scarcity is a risk for the planet, and agriculture?s contribution to water resource depletion is significant. It is thus important to implement methods to assess water use, especially by livestock. One method is the ?water footprint?, based on calculations of blue water (from rivers and groundwater, consumed by and for livestock and to irrigate their feed crops), green water (evapotranspiration of crops fed to livestock), and gray water (a virtual amount needed to dilute water pollution). Separately, these 3 types of water are useful for managing water resources, but summing them may lead to misinterpretations; in addition, the sum is not related to water scarcity. Another method, life cycle assessment, generally considers only blue water but also includes off-site activities needed to produc e inputs for animal production. A water stress index, a function of local water-depletion risk, is used to weigh water use to predict contribution of animal production on water scarcity. Regardless of the method, wide differences in water use exist depending upon country and type of livestock system. Attention is drawn to water resources and use in Brazil because of the importance of animal production there. Brazil has high regional heterogeneity in water resources, and water footprints can suggest ways to improve water use. Extensive ecommendations are provided for reducing blue, green, and gray water use in livestock systems. Special focus is placed on ways to decrease crop irrigation. It is concluded that livestock water use needs to be analyzed in greater detail to improve water management, but that it should be done in a multicriteria approach, considering other environmental impacts at the same time. MenosWater scarcity is a risk for the planet, and agriculture?s contribution to water resource depletion is significant. It is thus important to implement methods to assess water use, especially by livestock. One method is the ?water footprint?, based on calculations of blue water (from rivers and groundwater, consumed by and for livestock and to irrigate their feed crops), green water (evapotranspiration of crops fed to livestock), and gray water (a virtual amount needed to dilute water pollution). Separately, these 3 types of water are useful for managing water resources, but summing them may lead to misinterpretations; in addition, the sum is not related to water scarcity. Another method, life cycle assessment, generally considers only blue water but also includes off-site activities needed to produc e inputs for animal production. A water stress index, a function of local water-depletion risk, is used to weigh water use to predict contribution of animal production on water scarcity. Regardless of the method, wide differences in water use exist depending upon country and type of livestock system. Attention is drawn to water resources and use in Brazil because of the importance of animal production there. Brazil has high regional heterogeneity in water resources, and water footprints can suggest ways to improve water use. Extensive ecommendations are provided for reducing blue, green, and gray water use in livestock systems. Special focus is placed on ways to decrease crop irri... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Livestock systems; Water scarcity; Water use. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Brazil; life cycle assessment; water footprint. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02471nam a2200217 a 4500
001 1963130
005 2021-07-12
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aDOREAU, M.
245 $aWater consumption by livestock$bhow to calculate and optimize its use. Focus on Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: ANNUAL MEETING BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 50., 2013, Campinas. The integration of Knowledge in animal production - Palestra. Campinas: SBZ$c2013
300 $c1 CD-ROM
520 $aWater scarcity is a risk for the planet, and agriculture?s contribution to water resource depletion is significant. It is thus important to implement methods to assess water use, especially by livestock. One method is the ?water footprint?, based on calculations of blue water (from rivers and groundwater, consumed by and for livestock and to irrigate their feed crops), green water (evapotranspiration of crops fed to livestock), and gray water (a virtual amount needed to dilute water pollution). Separately, these 3 types of water are useful for managing water resources, but summing them may lead to misinterpretations; in addition, the sum is not related to water scarcity. Another method, life cycle assessment, generally considers only blue water but also includes off-site activities needed to produc e inputs for animal production. A water stress index, a function of local water-depletion risk, is used to weigh water use to predict contribution of animal production on water scarcity. Regardless of the method, wide differences in water use exist depending upon country and type of livestock system. Attention is drawn to water resources and use in Brazil because of the importance of animal production there. Brazil has high regional heterogeneity in water resources, and water footprints can suggest ways to improve water use. Extensive ecommendations are provided for reducing blue, green, and gray water use in livestock systems. Special focus is placed on ways to decrease crop irrigation. It is concluded that livestock water use needs to be analyzed in greater detail to improve water management, but that it should be done in a multicriteria approach, considering other environmental impacts at the same time.
650 $aBrazil
650 $alife cycle assessment
650 $awater footprint
653 $aLivestock systems
653 $aWater scarcity
653 $aWater use
700 1 $aPALHARES, J. C. P.
700 1 $aCORSON, M. S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
