| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpma.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
05/03/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/03/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
ROSSMANN, M.; FLORES, S. W. S.; CHIARAMONTE, J. B.; KMIT, M. C. P.; MENDES, R. |
|
Afiliação: |
MAIKE ROSSMANN, FAPESP; STALIN WLADIMIR SARANGO FLORES, ESALQ-USP; JOSIANE BARROS CHIARAMONTE, ESALQ-USP; MARIA CAROLINA PEZZO KMIT, ESALQ-USP; RODRIGO MENDES, CNPMA. |
|
Título: |
Plant microbiome: composition and functions in plant compartments. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: PYLRO, V.; ROESCH, L. (Ed.). The brazilian microbiome. Current status and perspectives. Cham: Springer International, 2017. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 7-20. |
|
ISBN: |
978-3-319-59997-7 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Knowledge of the vastness of microbial diversity associated with plants is still limited. Plant microbiome structure and functions are shaped by several factors, including host genotype and developmental stage, the presence or absence of diseases, and environmental conditions. These factors may lead to distinct microbial communities in the rhizosphere, endosphere, and phyllosphere. Studies directed to microbial interactions in plant compartments are fundamental for understanding the microbial ecology of phytobiomes, enabling the development of microbiome-based technologies in the search for sustainable agriculture. In this chapter, are described plant compartments, i.e., the rhizosphere, phyllosphere and endosphere, and the more common bacterial composition of each compartment. Are also discussed manipulation of the plant microbiome toward improved plant health. Advances in this ?eld will lead to strategies where the manipulation of the plant microbiome will allow the reduction of pesticide and fertilizer use in ?eld crops, paving the way to a more sustainable agriculture. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Phillosphere. |
|
Thesagro: |
Rizosfera. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Bacterial communities; Microbiome; Plant morphology. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01866naa a2200253 a 4500
001 2088510
005 2018-03-05
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-3-319-59997-7
100 1 $aROSSMANN, M.
245 $aPlant microbiome$bcomposition and functions in plant compartments.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
300 $ap. 7-20.
520 $aKnowledge of the vastness of microbial diversity associated with plants is still limited. Plant microbiome structure and functions are shaped by several factors, including host genotype and developmental stage, the presence or absence of diseases, and environmental conditions. These factors may lead to distinct microbial communities in the rhizosphere, endosphere, and phyllosphere. Studies directed to microbial interactions in plant compartments are fundamental for understanding the microbial ecology of phytobiomes, enabling the development of microbiome-based technologies in the search for sustainable agriculture. In this chapter, are described plant compartments, i.e., the rhizosphere, phyllosphere and endosphere, and the more common bacterial composition of each compartment. Are also discussed manipulation of the plant microbiome toward improved plant health. Advances in this ?eld will lead to strategies where the manipulation of the plant microbiome will allow the reduction of pesticide and fertilizer use in ?eld crops, paving the way to a more sustainable agriculture.
650 $aBacterial communities
650 $aMicrobiome
650 $aPlant morphology
650 $aRizosfera
653 $aPhillosphere
700 1 $aFLORES, S. W. S.
700 1 $aCHIARAMONTE, J. B.
700 1 $aKMIT, M. C. P.
700 1 $aMENDES, R.
773 $tIn: PYLRO, V.; ROESCH, L. (Ed.). The brazilian microbiome. Current status and perspectives. Cham: Springer International, 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatu.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/11/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
26/11/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SMITH, M. N.; TAYLOR, T. C.; HAREN, J. van; ROSOLEM, R.; RESTREPO-COUPE, N.; ADAMS, J.; WU, J.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de; SILVA, R. da; ARAUJO, A. C. de; CAMARGO, P. B. de; HUXMAN, T. E.; SALESKA, S. R. |
|
Afiliação: |
Marielle N. Smith, University of Arizona / Michigan State University; Tyeen C. Taylor, University of Arizona / University of Michigan; Joost van Haren, University of Arizona; Rafael Rosolem, University of Bristol; Natalia Restrepo-Coupe, University of Arizona / University of Technology Sydney; John Adams, University of Arizona; Jin Wu, The University of Hong Kong; RAIMUNDO COSME DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, CPATU; Rodrigo da Silva, UFOPA; ALESSANDRO CARIOCA DE ARAUJO, CPATU / INPA; Plinio B. de Camargo, CENA/USP; Travis E. Huxman, University of California; Scott R. Saleska, University of Arizona. |
|
Título: |
Empirical evidence for resilience of tropical forest photosynthesis in a warmer world. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Nature Plants, v. 6, p. 1225-1230, 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00780-2 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Tropical forests may be vulnerable to climate change if photosynthetic carbon uptake currently operates near a high temperature limit. Predicting tropical forest function requires understanding the relative contributions of two mechanisms of high-temperature photosynthetic declines: stomatal limitation (H1), an indirect response due to temperature-associated changes in atmospheric vapour pressure deficit (VPD), and biochemical restrictions (H2), a direct temperature response. Their relative control predicts different outcomes-H1 is expected to diminish with stomatal responses to future co-occurring elevated atmospheric [CO2], whereas H2 portends declining photosynthesis with increasing temperatures. Distinguishing the two mechanisms at high temperatures is therefore critical, but difficult because VPD is highly correlated with temperature in natural settings. We used a forest mesocosm to quantify the sensitivity of tropical gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) to future temperature regimes while constraining VPD by controlling humidity. We then analytically decoupled temperature and VPD effects under current climate with flux-tower-derived GEP trends in situ from four tropical forest sites. Both approaches showed consistent, negative sensitivity of GEP to VPD but little direct response to temperature. Importantly, in the mesocosm at low VPD, GEP persisted up to 38°C, a temperature exceeding projections for tropical forests in 2100 (ref.). If elevated [CO2] mitigates VPD-induced stomatal limitation through enhanced water-use efficiency as hypothesized, tropical forest photosynthesis may have a margin of resilience to future warming. MenosTropical forests may be vulnerable to climate change if photosynthetic carbon uptake currently operates near a high temperature limit. Predicting tropical forest function requires understanding the relative contributions of two mechanisms of high-temperature photosynthetic declines: stomatal limitation (H1), an indirect response due to temperature-associated changes in atmospheric vapour pressure deficit (VPD), and biochemical restrictions (H2), a direct temperature response. Their relative control predicts different outcomes-H1 is expected to diminish with stomatal responses to future co-occurring elevated atmospheric [CO2], whereas H2 portends declining photosynthesis with increasing temperatures. Distinguishing the two mechanisms at high temperatures is therefore critical, but difficult because VPD is highly correlated with temperature in natural settings. We used a forest mesocosm to quantify the sensitivity of tropical gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) to future temperature regimes while constraining VPD by controlling humidity. We then analytically decoupled temperature and VPD effects under current climate with flux-tower-derived GEP trends in situ from four tropical forest sites. Both approaches showed consistent, negative sensitivity of GEP to VPD but little direct response to temperature. Importantly, in the mesocosm at low VPD, GEP persisted up to 38°C, a temperature exceeding projections for tropical forests in 2100 (ref.). If elevated [CO2] mitigates VPD-induce... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Floresta Tropical; Fotossíntese. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02529naa a2200301 a 4500
001 2126677
005 2020-11-26
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00780-2$2DOI
100 1 $aSMITH, M. N.
245 $aEmpirical evidence for resilience of tropical forest photosynthesis in a warmer world.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aTropical forests may be vulnerable to climate change if photosynthetic carbon uptake currently operates near a high temperature limit. Predicting tropical forest function requires understanding the relative contributions of two mechanisms of high-temperature photosynthetic declines: stomatal limitation (H1), an indirect response due to temperature-associated changes in atmospheric vapour pressure deficit (VPD), and biochemical restrictions (H2), a direct temperature response. Their relative control predicts different outcomes-H1 is expected to diminish with stomatal responses to future co-occurring elevated atmospheric [CO2], whereas H2 portends declining photosynthesis with increasing temperatures. Distinguishing the two mechanisms at high temperatures is therefore critical, but difficult because VPD is highly correlated with temperature in natural settings. We used a forest mesocosm to quantify the sensitivity of tropical gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) to future temperature regimes while constraining VPD by controlling humidity. We then analytically decoupled temperature and VPD effects under current climate with flux-tower-derived GEP trends in situ from four tropical forest sites. Both approaches showed consistent, negative sensitivity of GEP to VPD but little direct response to temperature. Importantly, in the mesocosm at low VPD, GEP persisted up to 38°C, a temperature exceeding projections for tropical forests in 2100 (ref.). If elevated [CO2] mitigates VPD-induced stomatal limitation through enhanced water-use efficiency as hypothesized, tropical forest photosynthesis may have a margin of resilience to future warming.
650 $aFloresta Tropical
650 $aFotossíntese
700 1 $aTAYLOR, T. C.
700 1 $aHAREN, J. van
700 1 $aROSOLEM, R.
700 1 $aRESTREPO-COUPE, N.
700 1 $aADAMS, J.
700 1 $aWU, J.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de
700 1 $aSILVA, R. da
700 1 $aARAUJO, A. C. de
700 1 $aCAMARGO, P. B. de
700 1 $aHUXMAN, T. E.
700 1 $aSALESKA, S. R.
773 $tNature Plants$gv. 6, p. 1225-1230, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
