| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/12/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
18/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
MARTINS, A. M. M.; VASQUES, G. M.; DART, R. de O.; CARVALHO JUNIOR, W. de; BHERING, S. B.; CHAGAS, C. da S.; PEREIRA, N. R.; CALDERANO FILHO, B. |
|
Afiliação: |
ADINAN MARZULO MAIA MARTINS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO; GUSTAVO DE MATTOS VASQUES, CNPS; RICARDO DE OLIVEIRA DART, CNPS; WALDIR DE CARVALHO JUNIOR, CNPS; SILVIO BARGE BHERING, CNPS; CESAR DA SILVA CHAGAS, CNPS; NILSON RENDEIRO PEREIRA, CNPS; BRAZ CALDERANO FILHO, CNPS. |
|
Título: |
Série temporal do MapBiomas evidencia expansão agrícola e focos de erosão na bacia hidrográfica do Rio Iguatemi, Mato Grosso do Sul. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE RECURSOS HÍDRICOS, 25., 2023, Aracaju. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, 2023. Ref. XXV-SBRH0227. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
O manejo sustentável e a conservação do meio ambiente são essenciais para a conservação e gestão dos corpos hídricos. O monitoramento do uso e cobertura do solo proveniente da plataforma MapBiomas é uma alternativa viável para entender a sua dinâmica espacial em bacias hidrográficas ao longo de diferentes períodos. Este trabalho utilizou imagens MapBiomas de 1990, 2000, 2010 e 2020 da bacia hidrográfica do rio Iguatemi no sul do estado do Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil para identificar e quantificar mudanças no uso e cobertura do solo na bacia. A expansão de culturas agrícolas substituindo áreas de pastagem e de vegetação natural foram observadas na bacia entre 1990 e 2020. Outra constatação importante é o crescimento da classe "Outras Áreas Não Vegetadas" em áreas próximas a cursos d’água, a qual está relacionada à erosão que causa o assoreamento dos rios Iguatemi e Paraná. O trabalho evidencia as tendências mais importantes de mudanças de uso e cobertura da terra na bacia hidrográfica do rio Iguatemi e identifica áreas que merecem atenção para controle de processos erosivos, evitando assim os impactos negativos ao reservatório da Usina Hidrelétrica de Itaipu de grande relevância para a segurança energética nacional. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Assoreamento. |
|
Thesagro: |
Cobertura do Solo; Sensoriamento Remoto; Uso da Terra. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Land cover; Land use; Remote sensing. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1159850/1/Serie-temporal-do-MapBiomas-evidencia-expansao-agricola-2023.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02261nam a2200277 a 4500
001 2159850
005 2023-12-18
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aMARTINS, A. M. M.
245 $aSérie temporal do MapBiomas evidencia expansão agrícola e focos de erosão na bacia hidrográfica do Rio Iguatemi, Mato Grosso do Sul.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE RECURSOS HÍDRICOS, 25., 2023, Aracaju. Anais [...]. Porto Alegre: Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, 2023. Ref. XXV-SBRH0227.$c0227
520 $aO manejo sustentável e a conservação do meio ambiente são essenciais para a conservação e gestão dos corpos hídricos. O monitoramento do uso e cobertura do solo proveniente da plataforma MapBiomas é uma alternativa viável para entender a sua dinâmica espacial em bacias hidrográficas ao longo de diferentes períodos. Este trabalho utilizou imagens MapBiomas de 1990, 2000, 2010 e 2020 da bacia hidrográfica do rio Iguatemi no sul do estado do Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil para identificar e quantificar mudanças no uso e cobertura do solo na bacia. A expansão de culturas agrícolas substituindo áreas de pastagem e de vegetação natural foram observadas na bacia entre 1990 e 2020. Outra constatação importante é o crescimento da classe "Outras Áreas Não Vegetadas" em áreas próximas a cursos d’água, a qual está relacionada à erosão que causa o assoreamento dos rios Iguatemi e Paraná. O trabalho evidencia as tendências mais importantes de mudanças de uso e cobertura da terra na bacia hidrográfica do rio Iguatemi e identifica áreas que merecem atenção para controle de processos erosivos, evitando assim os impactos negativos ao reservatório da Usina Hidrelétrica de Itaipu de grande relevância para a segurança energética nacional.
650 $aLand cover
650 $aLand use
650 $aRemote sensing
650 $aCobertura do Solo
650 $aSensoriamento Remoto
650 $aUso da Terra
653 $aAssoreamento
700 1 $aVASQUES, G. M.
700 1 $aDART, R. de O.
700 1 $aCARVALHO JUNIOR, W. de
700 1 $aBHERING, S. B.
700 1 $aCHAGAS, C. da S.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, N. R.
700 1 $aCALDERANO FILHO, B.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/12/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/12/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
BOULAY, A. M.; DRASTIG, K.; AMANULLAH; CHAPAGAIN, A.; CHARLON, V.; CIVIT, B.; CAMILLIS, C. DE; SOUZA, M. DE; HESS, T.; HOEKSTRA, A. Y.; IBIDHI, R.; LATHUILLIERE, M. J.; MANZARDO, A.; MCALLISTER, T.; MORALES, R. A.; MOTOSHITA, M.; PALHARES, J. C. P.; PIRLO, G.; RIDOUTT, B.; RUSSO, V.; SALMORAL, G.; SINGH, R.; VANHAM, D.; WIEDEMANN, S.; ZHENG, W.; PFISTER, S. |
|
Afiliação: |
ANNE-MARIE BOULAY, Sherbrooke University; KATRIN DRASTIG, Polytechnique Montreal; AMANULLAH, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences; ASHOK CHAPAGAIN, Pacific Institute, USA; VERONICA CHARLON, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA); BÁRBARA CIVIT, INAHE CONICET and UTN FRM Mendoza; CAMILLO DE CAMILLIS, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); MARLOS DE SOUZA, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); TIM HESS, Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, United Kingdom; ARJEN Y. HOEKSTRA, Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; RIDHA IBIDHI, Department of Animal and Forage Production, National Institute of Agronomic Research of Tunisia (INRAT), Ariana, Tunisia; MICHAEL J. LATHUILLIÈRE, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; ALESSANDRO MANZARDO, CESQA, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; TIM MCALLISTER, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada; RICARDO A. MORALES, AgroDer SC, Mexico DF, Mexico; MASAHARU MOTOSHITA, Institute of Science for Safety and Sustainability, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan; JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; GIACOMO PIRLO, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Lodi, Italy; BRAD RIDOUTT, Department Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa; VALENTINA RUSSO, Environmental and Process Systems Engineering Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town, 7701 Rondebosch, South Africa; GLORIA SALMORAL, Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, United Kingdom; RANVIR SINGH, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; DAVY VANHAM, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy; STEPHEN WIEDEMANN, Integrity Ag and Environment, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia; WEICHAO ZHENG, China Agricultural University, China; STEPHAN PFISTER, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH-Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. |
|
Título: |
Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ecological Indicators, v.124, may 2021, 107391. |
|
Páginas: |
11 p. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only ?blue water?); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including ?green? and ?blue water? consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. Despite the main focus on feed and livestock production systems, the outcomes of this LEAP TAG are also applicable to many other agriculture sectors. MenosThe FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantifica... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Water footprinting; Water productivity; Water scarcity footprint; Water use assessment. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Livestock production. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/229026/1/BuildingConsensusWater.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 04009naa a2200505 a 4500
001 2137681
005 2021-12-13
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391$2DOI
100 1 $aBOULAY, A. M.
245 $aBuilding consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains$boutcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP partnership.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
300 $a11 p.
520 $aThe FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only ?blue water?); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including ?green? and ?blue water? consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. Despite the main focus on feed and livestock production systems, the outcomes of this LEAP TAG are also applicable to many other agriculture sectors.
650 $aLivestock production
653 $aWater footprinting
653 $aWater productivity
653 $aWater scarcity footprint
653 $aWater use assessment
700 1 $aDRASTIG, K.
700 1 $aAMANULLAH
700 1 $aCHAPAGAIN, A.
700 1 $aCHARLON, V.
700 1 $aCIVIT, B.
700 1 $aCAMILLIS, C. DE
700 1 $aSOUZA, M. DE
700 1 $aHESS, T.
700 1 $aHOEKSTRA, A. Y.
700 1 $aIBIDHI, R.
700 1 $aLATHUILLIERE, M. J.
700 1 $aMANZARDO, A.
700 1 $aMCALLISTER, T.
700 1 $aMORALES, R. A.
700 1 $aMOTOSHITA, M.
700 1 $aPALHARES, J. C. P.
700 1 $aPIRLO, G.
700 1 $aRIDOUTT, B.
700 1 $aRUSSO, V.
700 1 $aSALMORAL, G.
700 1 $aSINGH, R.
700 1 $aVANHAM, D.
700 1 $aWIEDEMANN, S.
700 1 $aZHENG, W.
700 1 $aPFISTER, S.
773 $tEcological Indicators$gv.124, may 2021, 107391.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
