| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/03/2011 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/12/2011 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BUENO, A. de F.; BATISTELA, M. J.; BUENO, R. C. O. de F.; FRANCA-NETO, J. de B.; NISHIKAWA, M. A. N.; LIBÉRIO FILHO, A. |
|
Afiliação: |
ADENEY DE FREITAS BUENO, CNPSO; MARCELO JOSÉ BATISTELA, FESURV / Monsanto do Brasil; REGIANE CRISTINA DE FREITAS BUENO, FESURV; JOSE DE BARROS FRANCA NETO, CNPSO; MARCELO AKITA NAIME NISHIKAWA, Monsanto do Brasil; ADEONE LIBÉRIO FILHO, Universidade Católica de Goiás. |
|
Título: |
Effects of integrated pest management, biological control and prophylactic use os insecticides on the management and sustainability of soybean. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2011 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Crop Protection, v. 30, n. 7, p. 937-945, jul. 2011. |
|
DOI: |
10.1016/J.CROPRO.2011.02.021 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study aimed to evaluate the prophylactic use of insecticides (PUI) in comparison with integrated pest management (IPM) and biological control (BC) strategies. Five replicated experiments were carried out independently in two Brazilian soybean-producing states, Goiás and Paraná, where those pestcontrol strategies were evaluated during two consecutive growing seasons. The evaluated treatments were integrated pest management (IPM); prophylactic use of insecticides (PUI), a practice that has been increasingly adopted by soybean growers in Brazil as well as in other Latin American countries; biological control (BC) and the control (C), which involved no pest treatment. Although the pest infestation rates in the BC and IPM treatments were higher than that in the PUI treatment, crop productivity, in general, was similar among these treatments and differed only from the control with no pest treatment. These results indicate that the prophylactic use of insecticides on soybeans does not result in higher productivity in the field and that this practice merely requires larger amounts of pesticides, which can impair the sustainability of the soybean crop. Therefore, the use of IPM still remains the best alternative for pest management in soybean fields. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Manejo integrado de pragas. |
|
Thesagro: |
Controle integrado; Praga de planta; Soja. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Integrated pest management; Soybeans. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
O Insetos e Entomologia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02118naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1881499
005 2011-12-08
008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/J.CROPRO.2011.02.021$2DOI
100 1 $aBUENO, A. de F.
245 $aEffects of integrated pest management, biological control and prophylactic use os insecticides on the management and sustainability of soybean.
260 $c2011
520 $aThis study aimed to evaluate the prophylactic use of insecticides (PUI) in comparison with integrated pest management (IPM) and biological control (BC) strategies. Five replicated experiments were carried out independently in two Brazilian soybean-producing states, Goiás and Paraná, where those pestcontrol strategies were evaluated during two consecutive growing seasons. The evaluated treatments were integrated pest management (IPM); prophylactic use of insecticides (PUI), a practice that has been increasingly adopted by soybean growers in Brazil as well as in other Latin American countries; biological control (BC) and the control (C), which involved no pest treatment. Although the pest infestation rates in the BC and IPM treatments were higher than that in the PUI treatment, crop productivity, in general, was similar among these treatments and differed only from the control with no pest treatment. These results indicate that the prophylactic use of insecticides on soybeans does not result in higher productivity in the field and that this practice merely requires larger amounts of pesticides, which can impair the sustainability of the soybean crop. Therefore, the use of IPM still remains the best alternative for pest management in soybean fields.
650 $aIntegrated pest management
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aControle integrado
650 $aPraga de planta
650 $aSoja
653 $aManejo integrado de pragas
700 1 $aBATISTELA, M. J.
700 1 $aBUENO, R. C. O. de F.
700 1 $aFRANCA-NETO, J. de B.
700 1 $aNISHIKAWA, M. A. N.
700 1 $aLIBÉRIO FILHO, A.
773 $tCrop Protection$gv. 30, n. 7, p. 937-945, jul. 2011.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 77 | |
| 18. |  | BUENO, R. C. O. de F.; CARNEIRO, T. R.; PRATISSOLI, D.; BUENO, A. de F.; FERNANDES, O. F. Biology and thermal requirements of Telenomus remus reared on fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda eggs. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 38, n. 1, p.1-6, jan./fev. 2008.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: Internacional - A |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
|    |
| 19. | | BUENO, A. de F.; OLIVEIRA, L. J.; CATTELAN, A. J.; BUENO, R. C. O. de F.; NUNES JUNIOR, J. Resposta de soja inoculada com Pseudomonas sp. do grupo fluorescente em área infestada por larvas de Liogenys fuscus Blanch. (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae). In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ENTOMOLOGIA, 22., 2008, Uberlândia. Ciência, tecnologia e inovação: anais. Viçosa, MG: UFV, 2008. 1 CD-ROM. Resumo n. 815-2.| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 77 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
