| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/09/2005 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/09/2005 |
|
Autoria: |
BOS, M. G.; NUGTEREN, J. |
|
Título: |
On irrigation efficiencies. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1983 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Wageningen: International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, 1983. |
|
Páginas: |
138 p. |
|
ISBN: |
90-70260-875 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Definition of the problem; Method of investigation applied; Data processing: Grouping of areas; definitions of efficiencies; Calculating theefficiencies; Efficiency terminology and reuse; Accuracy of the calculated efficiencies. Some results not directly related to irrigation efficiency: Field irrigation method versus irrigated area; Farm size distribution; Number of farms served by group inlets; Project staffing. Analysis and evaluation of the data from the questionaire with respect to irrigation efficiency: Conveyance efficiency; Conveyance efficiency versus average irrigable area; Conveyance efficiency versus size of rotational unit; Conveyance efficiency as a function of technical equipment; Distribution efficiency; Distribution efficiency versus farm sizeand soil type; Distribution efficiency versus duration of delivery period; Farm inlet versus group inlet; Field application efficiency; Influence of field irrigation method on field application efficiency; Effect of depth of application on e (a); Field application efficiency versus farm size and soil type; Influence of farm flow rate on applicationefficiency; Tertiary unit efficiency; Influence of flow rate at farm inlet on tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of water charges to tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of tertiary unit efficiency to method of water supply to the farm; Irrigation system efficiency; Relation of irrigation system efficiency to actually irrigated area; Influence of project management on irrigation system efficiency; Everall or project efficiency. Practical application of the study results with some examples. Evaluation of the applied approach. Conclusions and recommendations. MenosDefinition of the problem; Method of investigation applied; Data processing: Grouping of areas; definitions of efficiencies; Calculating theefficiencies; Efficiency terminology and reuse; Accuracy of the calculated efficiencies. Some results not directly related to irrigation efficiency: Field irrigation method versus irrigated area; Farm size distribution; Number of farms served by group inlets; Project staffing. Analysis and evaluation of the data from the questionaire with respect to irrigation efficiency: Conveyance efficiency; Conveyance efficiency versus average irrigable area; Conveyance efficiency versus size of rotational unit; Conveyance efficiency as a function of technical equipment; Distribution efficiency; Distribution efficiency versus farm sizeand soil type; Distribution efficiency versus duration of delivery period; Farm inlet versus group inlet; Field application efficiency; Influence of field irrigation method on field application efficiency; Effect of depth of application on e (a); Field application efficiency versus farm size and soil type; Influence of farm flow rate on applicationefficiency; Tertiary unit efficiency; Influence of flow rate at farm inlet on tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of water charges to tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of tertiary unit efficiency to method of water supply to the farm; Irrigation system efficiency; Relation of irrigation system efficiency to actually irrigated area; Influence of project management on irrigation... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Eficiência; Resultado; Uso. |
|
Thesagro: |
Irrigação. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02169nam a2200193 a 4500
001 1250899
005 2005-09-29
008 1983 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d
020 $a90-70260-875
100 1 $aBOS, M. G.
245 $aOn irrigation efficiencies.
260 $aWageningen: International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement$c1983
300 $a138 p.
520 $aDefinition of the problem; Method of investigation applied; Data processing: Grouping of areas; definitions of efficiencies; Calculating theefficiencies; Efficiency terminology and reuse; Accuracy of the calculated efficiencies. Some results not directly related to irrigation efficiency: Field irrigation method versus irrigated area; Farm size distribution; Number of farms served by group inlets; Project staffing. Analysis and evaluation of the data from the questionaire with respect to irrigation efficiency: Conveyance efficiency; Conveyance efficiency versus average irrigable area; Conveyance efficiency versus size of rotational unit; Conveyance efficiency as a function of technical equipment; Distribution efficiency; Distribution efficiency versus farm sizeand soil type; Distribution efficiency versus duration of delivery period; Farm inlet versus group inlet; Field application efficiency; Influence of field irrigation method on field application efficiency; Effect of depth of application on e (a); Field application efficiency versus farm size and soil type; Influence of farm flow rate on applicationefficiency; Tertiary unit efficiency; Influence of flow rate at farm inlet on tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of water charges to tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of tertiary unit efficiency to method of water supply to the farm; Irrigation system efficiency; Relation of irrigation system efficiency to actually irrigated area; Influence of project management on irrigation system efficiency; Everall or project efficiency. Practical application of the study results with some examples. Evaluation of the applied approach. Conclusions and recommendations.
650 $aIrrigação
653 $aEficiência
653 $aResultado
653 $aUso
700 1 $aNUGTEREN, J.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste (CPAO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|
Data corrente: |
04/11/2010 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
04/11/2010 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
SENA, A. P. A.; CHAIBUB, A. A.; MESQUITA, F. L.; GONÇALVES, F. J.; ARAUJO, L. G.; FILIPPI, M. C.; SILVA, G. B. |
|
Afiliação: |
A. P. A. SENA, UFG; A. A. CHAIBUB, UFG; F. L. MESQUITA, UFG; F. J. GONÇALVES, UFG; L. G. ARAUJO, UFG; MARTA CRISTINA CORSI DE FILIPPI, CNPAF; G. B. SILVA, UFRA. |
|
Título: |
Eficiência dos antagonistas Epicoccum e Sporobolomyces no controle de brusone nas folhas em arroz. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2010 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Tropical Plant Pathology, Brasília, DF, v. 35, p. S57, ago. 2010. Suplemento, ref. 02.044. Edição dos resumos do XLIII Congresso Brasileiro de Fitopatologia, Cuiabá, ago. 2010. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Thesagro: |
Arroz; Brusone; Doença de planta; Oryza sativa. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Magnaporthe oryzae. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
H Saúde e Patologia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/23455/1/CBF4.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00803nam a2200229 a 4500
001 1865987
005 2010-11-04
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSENA, A. P. A.
245 $aEficiência dos antagonistas Epicoccum e Sporobolomyces no controle de brusone nas folhas em arroz.
260 $aTropical Plant Pathology, Brasília, DF, v. 35, p. S57, ago. 2010. Suplemento, ref. 02.044. Edição dos resumos do XLIII Congresso Brasileiro de Fitopatologia, Cuiabá, ago. 2010.$c2010
650 $aMagnaporthe oryzae
650 $aArroz
650 $aBrusone
650 $aDoença de planta
650 $aOryza sativa
700 1 $aCHAIBUB, A. A.
700 1 $aMESQUITA, F. L.
700 1 $aGONÇALVES, F. J.
700 1 $aARAUJO, L. G.
700 1 $aFILIPPI, M. C.
700 1 $aSILVA, G. B.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
