|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Meio Norte / UEP-Parnaíba. |
Data corrente: |
26/11/1993 |
Data da última atualização: |
13/10/2016 |
Autoria: |
BOS, M. G.; NUGTEREN, J. |
Título: |
On irrigation efficiencies. |
Edição: |
4th ed. |
Ano de publicação: |
1990 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Wageningen: ILRI, 1990. |
Páginas: |
117 p. |
Descrição Física: |
il. |
Série: |
(ILRI. Publication, 19). |
ISBN: |
90-70260-875 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Definition of the problem; Method of investigation applied; Data processing: Grouping of areas; definitions of efficiencies; Calculating theefficiencies; Efficiency terminology and reuse; Accuracy of the calculated efficiencies. Some results not directly related to irrigation efficiency: Field irrigation method versus irrigated area; Farm size distribution; Number of farms served by group inlets; Project staffing. Analysis and evaluation of the data from the questionaire with respect to irrigation efficiency: Conveyance efficiency; Conveyance efficiency versus average irrigable area; Conveyance efficiency versus size of rotational unit; Conveyance efficiency as a function of technical equipment; Distribution efficiency; Distribution efficiency versus farm sizeand soil type; Distribution efficiency versus duration of delivery period; Farm inlet versus group inlet; Field application efficiency; Influence of field irrigation method on field application efficiency; Effect of depth of application on e (a); Field application efficiency versus farm size and soil type; Influence of farm flow rate on applicationefficiency; Tertiary unit efficiency; Influence of flow rate at farm inlet on tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of water charges to tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of tertiary unit efficiency to method of water supply to the farm; Irrigation system efficiency; Relation of irrigation system efficiency to actually irrigated area; Influence of project management on irrigation system efficiency; Everall or project efficiency. Practical application of the study results with some examples. Evaluation of the applied approach. Conclusions and recommendations. MenosDefinition of the problem; Method of investigation applied; Data processing: Grouping of areas; definitions of efficiencies; Calculating theefficiencies; Efficiency terminology and reuse; Accuracy of the calculated efficiencies. Some results not directly related to irrigation efficiency: Field irrigation method versus irrigated area; Farm size distribution; Number of farms served by group inlets; Project staffing. Analysis and evaluation of the data from the questionaire with respect to irrigation efficiency: Conveyance efficiency; Conveyance efficiency versus average irrigable area; Conveyance efficiency versus size of rotational unit; Conveyance efficiency as a function of technical equipment; Distribution efficiency; Distribution efficiency versus farm sizeand soil type; Distribution efficiency versus duration of delivery period; Farm inlet versus group inlet; Field application efficiency; Influence of field irrigation method on field application efficiency; Effect of depth of application on e (a); Field application efficiency versus farm size and soil type; Influence of farm flow rate on applicationefficiency; Tertiary unit efficiency; Influence of flow rate at farm inlet on tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of water charges to tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of tertiary unit efficiency to method of water supply to the farm; Irrigation system efficiency; Relation of irrigation system efficiency to actually irrigated area; Influence of project management on irrigation... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Efficiency; Eficiencia; Resultados; Results; Use; Uso. |
Thesagro: |
Irrigação. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
irrigation. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02281nam a2200265 a 4500 001 1240607 005 2016-10-13 008 1990 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d 020 $a90-70260-875 100 1 $aBOS, M. G. 245 $aOn irrigation efficiencies. 250 $a4th ed. 260 $aWageningen: ILRI$c1990 300 $a117 p.$cil. 490 $a(ILRI. Publication, 19). 520 $aDefinition of the problem; Method of investigation applied; Data processing: Grouping of areas; definitions of efficiencies; Calculating theefficiencies; Efficiency terminology and reuse; Accuracy of the calculated efficiencies. Some results not directly related to irrigation efficiency: Field irrigation method versus irrigated area; Farm size distribution; Number of farms served by group inlets; Project staffing. Analysis and evaluation of the data from the questionaire with respect to irrigation efficiency: Conveyance efficiency; Conveyance efficiency versus average irrigable area; Conveyance efficiency versus size of rotational unit; Conveyance efficiency as a function of technical equipment; Distribution efficiency; Distribution efficiency versus farm sizeand soil type; Distribution efficiency versus duration of delivery period; Farm inlet versus group inlet; Field application efficiency; Influence of field irrigation method on field application efficiency; Effect of depth of application on e (a); Field application efficiency versus farm size and soil type; Influence of farm flow rate on applicationefficiency; Tertiary unit efficiency; Influence of flow rate at farm inlet on tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of water charges to tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of tertiary unit efficiency to method of water supply to the farm; Irrigation system efficiency; Relation of irrigation system efficiency to actually irrigated area; Influence of project management on irrigation system efficiency; Everall or project efficiency. Practical application of the study results with some examples. Evaluation of the applied approach. Conclusions and recommendations. 650 $airrigation 650 $aIrrigação 653 $aEfficiency 653 $aEficiencia 653 $aResultados 653 $aResults 653 $aUse 653 $aUso 700 1 $aNUGTEREN, J.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste (CPAO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
Data corrente: |
30/01/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
06/09/2021 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
Autoria: |
QUEIROZ, E. B. de; SILVA, F. C. da; BORELLA JUNIOR, C.; ARAUJO, M. S.; HIROSE, E.; JESUS, F. G. de. |
Afiliação: |
UNIVERSITY OF GOIAS STATE, CAMPUS DE IPAMERI, IPAMERI; FEDERAL GOIANO INSTITUTE, URUTAÍ; FEDERAL GOIANO INSTITUTE, URUTAÍ; UNIVERSITY OF GOIAS STATE, CAMPUS DE IPAMERI, IPAMERI; EDSON HIROSE, CNPSO; FEDERAL GOIANO INSTITUTE, URUTAÍ. |
Título: |
Antixenosis in soybean to Spodoptera cosmioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) mediated by leaf color and trichome density. |
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Phytoparasitica, v. 48, p. 813-821, 2020. |
DOI: |
10.1007/s12600-020-00840-5 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Thesagro: |
Lagarta; Soja; Variedade Resistente. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Pest resistance; Soybeans; Varietal resistance. |
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/220780/1/Edson-Hirose-Artigo-2020-1.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00771naa a2200253 a 4500 001 2129695 005 2021-09-06 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/s12600-020-00840-5$2DOI 100 1 $aQUEIROZ, E. B. de 245 $aAntixenosis in soybean to Spodoptera cosmioides (Lepidoptera$bNoctuidae) mediated by leaf color and trichome density.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 650 $aPest resistance 650 $aSoybeans 650 $aVarietal resistance 650 $aLagarta 650 $aSoja 650 $aVariedade Resistente 700 1 $aSILVA, F. C. da 700 1 $aBORELLA JUNIOR, C. 700 1 $aARAUJO, M. S. 700 1 $aHIROSE, E. 700 1 $aJESUS, F. G. de 773 $tPhytoparasitica$gv. 48, p. 813-821, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|