| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Territorial. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/05/2012 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
16/09/2014 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
LI, G.; LU, D.; DUTRA, L.; BATISTELLA, M. |
|
Afiliação: |
GUIYING LI, INDIANA UNIVERSITY; DENGSHENG LU, INDIANA UNIVERSITY; LUCIANO DUTRA, INPE; MATEUS BATISTELLA, CNPM. |
|
Título: |
A comparative analysis of ALOS PALSAR L-band and RADARSAT-2 C-band data for land-cover classification in a tropical moist region. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2012 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, v. 70, p. 26-38, 2012. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 26-38. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This paper explores the use of ALOS (Advanced Land Observing Satellite) PALSARL-band (Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar) and RADARSAT-2 C-band data for land-cover classification in a tropical moist region. Transformed divergence was used to identify potential textural images which were calculated with the gray-level co-occurrence matrix method. The standard deviation of selected textural images and correlation coefficients between them were then used to determine the best combination of texture images for land-cover classification. Classification results based on different scenarios with maximum likelihood classifier were compared. Based on the identified best scenarios, different classification algorithms ? maximum likelihood classifier, classification tree analysis, Fuzzy ARTMAP (a neural-network method), k-nearest neighbor, object-based classification, and support vector machine were compared for examining which algorithm was suitable for land-cover classification in the tropical moist region. This research indicates that the combination of radiometric images and their textures provided considerably better classification accuracies than individual datasets. The L-band data provided much better landcover classification than C-band data but neither L-band nor C-band was suitable for fine land-cover classification system, no matter which classification algorithm was used. L-band data provided reasonably good classification accuracies for coarse land-cover classification system such as forest, succession, agropasture, water, wetland, and urban with an overall classification accuracy of 72.2%, but C-band data provided only 54.7%. Compared to the maximum likelihood classifier, both classification tree analysis and Fuzzy ARTMAP provided better performances, object-based classification and support vector machine had similar performances, and k-nearest neighbor performed poorly. More research should address the use of multitemporal radar data and the integration of radar and optical sensor data for improving land-cover classification. MenosThis paper explores the use of ALOS (Advanced Land Observing Satellite) PALSARL-band (Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar) and RADARSAT-2 C-band data for land-cover classification in a tropical moist region. Transformed divergence was used to identify potential textural images which were calculated with the gray-level co-occurrence matrix method. The standard deviation of selected textural images and correlation coefficients between them were then used to determine the best combination of texture images for land-cover classification. Classification results based on different scenarios with maximum likelihood classifier were compared. Based on the identified best scenarios, different classification algorithms ? maximum likelihood classifier, classification tree analysis, Fuzzy ARTMAP (a neural-network method), k-nearest neighbor, object-based classification, and support vector machine were compared for examining which algorithm was suitable for land-cover classification in the tropical moist region. This research indicates that the combination of radiometric images and their textures provided considerably better classification accuracies than individual datasets. The L-band data provided much better landcover classification than C-band data but neither L-band nor C-band was suitable for fine land-cover classification system, no matter which classification algorithm was used. L-band data provided reasonably good classification accuracies for coarse land-cover cla... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
ALOS PALSAR; Amazon; Land-cover classification; RADARSAT. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
texture. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/59517/1/MateusISPRS.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02748naa a2200229 a 4500
001 1924819
005 2014-09-16
008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aLI, G.
245 $aA comparative analysis of ALOS PALSAR L-band and RADARSAT-2 C-band data for land-cover classification in a tropical moist region.
260 $c2012
300 $ap. 26-38.
520 $aThis paper explores the use of ALOS (Advanced Land Observing Satellite) PALSARL-band (Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar) and RADARSAT-2 C-band data for land-cover classification in a tropical moist region. Transformed divergence was used to identify potential textural images which were calculated with the gray-level co-occurrence matrix method. The standard deviation of selected textural images and correlation coefficients between them were then used to determine the best combination of texture images for land-cover classification. Classification results based on different scenarios with maximum likelihood classifier were compared. Based on the identified best scenarios, different classification algorithms ? maximum likelihood classifier, classification tree analysis, Fuzzy ARTMAP (a neural-network method), k-nearest neighbor, object-based classification, and support vector machine were compared for examining which algorithm was suitable for land-cover classification in the tropical moist region. This research indicates that the combination of radiometric images and their textures provided considerably better classification accuracies than individual datasets. The L-band data provided much better landcover classification than C-band data but neither L-band nor C-band was suitable for fine land-cover classification system, no matter which classification algorithm was used. L-band data provided reasonably good classification accuracies for coarse land-cover classification system such as forest, succession, agropasture, water, wetland, and urban with an overall classification accuracy of 72.2%, but C-band data provided only 54.7%. Compared to the maximum likelihood classifier, both classification tree analysis and Fuzzy ARTMAP provided better performances, object-based classification and support vector machine had similar performances, and k-nearest neighbor performed poorly. More research should address the use of multitemporal radar data and the integration of radar and optical sensor data for improving land-cover classification.
650 $atexture
653 $aALOS PALSAR
653 $aAmazon
653 $aLand-cover classification
653 $aRADARSAT
700 1 $aLU, D.
700 1 $aDUTRA, L.
700 1 $aBATISTELLA, M.
773 $tISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing$gv. 70, p. 26-38, 2012.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Territorial (CNPM) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 268 | |
| Registros recuperados : 268 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
