|
|
Registros recuperados : 6 | |
1. | | RAYMER, P. L.; DAY, J. L.; GIPSON, R. D.; BAKER, S. H.; BRANCH, W. D.; STEPHENSON, M. G. 1990 field crops performance tests: soybeans, peanuts, cotton, tobacco, sorghum, and summer annual forages. Athens: The University of Georgia. Agricultural Experiment Stations, 1991. 81p. il. (The University of Georgia. Agricultural Experiment Stations. Research Report, 599). Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Soja. |
| |
2. | | RAYMER, P. L.; DAY, J. L.; BENNETT, R. B.; BAKER, S. H.; BRANCH, W. D.; STEPHENSON, M. G. ed. 1992 field crops performance tests: soybeans, peanuts, cotton, tobacco, sorghum, and summer annual forages. Athens: The University of Georgia, 1992. 86p. (The University of Georgia. Research Report, 618). Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
3. | | RAYMER, P. L.; DAY, J. L.; BENNETT, R. B.; BAKER, S. H.; BRANCH, W. D.; STEPHENSON, M.G. (Ed.). 1993 field crops perfomance tests: soybean, peanut, cotton, tobacco, sorghum, and summer annual forages Georgia: University of Georgia, 1994. 85p. (Research Report, 627) Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Algodão. |
| |
4. | | RAYMER, P. L.; DAY, J. L.; BENNETT, R. B.; BAKER, S. H.; BRANCH, W. D.; STEPHENSON, M. G. 1993 field crops performance tests: soybean, peanut, cotton, tobacco, sorghum, and summer annual forages. Athens: The University of Georgia, 1994. 85 p. (Research Report, 627). Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Soja. |
| |
5. | | RAYMER, P. L.; DAY, J. L.; COY, A. E.; BAKER, S. H.; BRANCH, W. D.; STEPHENSON, M. G. 1994 field crops performance tests: soybean, peanut, cotton, tobacco, sorghum, and summer annual forages. Athens: The University of Georgia. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. The Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations, 1995. 94p. (The Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station. Research Report, 633). Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
6. | | RAYMER, P. L.; DAY, J. L.; COY, A. E.; BAKER, S. H.; BRANCH, W. D.; STEPHENSON, M. G. ed. 1995 field crops performance tests: soybean, peanut, cotton, tobacco, sorghum, grain millet, and summer annual forages. Athens: University of Georgia. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. The Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations, 1996. 94p. (The Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations. Research Report, 639). Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 6 | |
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpms.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
Data corrente: |
14/12/2005 |
Data da última atualização: |
30/05/2018 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
PINEROS, M. A.; SHAFF, J. E.; MANSLANK, H. S.; ALVES, V. M. C.; KOCHIAN, L. V. |
Afiliação: |
VERA MARIA CARVALHO ALVES, CNPMS. |
Título: |
Aluminum resistance in maize cannot be solely explained by root organic acid exudation. A comparative physiological study |
Ano de publicação: |
2005 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Plant Physiology, Bethesda, v. 137, n. 1, p. 231-241, 2005. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Root apical aluminum (Al) exclusion via Al-activated root citrate exudation is widely accepted as the main Al-resistance mechanism operating in maize (Zea mays) roots. Nonetheless, the correlation between Al resistance and this Al-exclusion mechanism has not been tested beyond a very small number of Al-resistant and Al-sensitive maize lines. In this study, we conducted a comparative study of the physiology of Al resistance using six different maize genotypes that capture the range of maize Al resistance and differ significantly in their genetic background (three Brazilian and three North American genotypes). In these maize lines, we were able to establish a clear correlation between root tip Al exclusion (based on root Al content) and Al resistance. Both Al-resistant genotypes and three of the four Al-sensitive lines exhibited a significant Al-activated citrate exudation, with no evidence for Al activation of root malate or phosphate release. There was a lack of correlation between differential Al resistance and root citrate exudation for the six maize genotypes; in fact, one of the Al-sensitive lines, Mo17, had the largest Al-activated citrate exudation of all of the maize lines. Our results indicate that although root organic acid release may play a role in maize Al resistance, it is clearly not the only or the main resistance mechanism operating in these maize roots. A number of other potential Al-resistance mechanisms were investigated, including release of other Al-chelating ligands, Al-induced alkalinization of rhizosphere pH, changes in internal levels of Al-chelating compounds in the root, and Al translocation to the shoot. However, we were unsuccessful in identifying additional Al-resistance mechanisms in maize. It is likely that a purely physiological approach may not be sufficient to identify these novel Al-resistance mechanisms in maize and this will require an interdisciplinary approach integrating genetic, molecular, and physiological investigations. MenosRoot apical aluminum (Al) exclusion via Al-activated root citrate exudation is widely accepted as the main Al-resistance mechanism operating in maize (Zea mays) roots. Nonetheless, the correlation between Al resistance and this Al-exclusion mechanism has not been tested beyond a very small number of Al-resistant and Al-sensitive maize lines. In this study, we conducted a comparative study of the physiology of Al resistance using six different maize genotypes that capture the range of maize Al resistance and differ significantly in their genetic background (three Brazilian and three North American genotypes). In these maize lines, we were able to establish a clear correlation between root tip Al exclusion (based on root Al content) and Al resistance. Both Al-resistant genotypes and three of the four Al-sensitive lines exhibited a significant Al-activated citrate exudation, with no evidence for Al activation of root malate or phosphate release. There was a lack of correlation between differential Al resistance and root citrate exudation for the six maize genotypes; in fact, one of the Al-sensitive lines, Mo17, had the largest Al-activated citrate exudation of all of the maize lines. Our results indicate that although root organic acid release may play a role in maize Al resistance, it is clearly not the only or the main resistance mechanism operating in these maize roots. A number of other potential Al-resistance mechanisms were investigated, including release of other Al-chel... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Milho. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02572naa a2200181 a 4500 001 1489062 005 2018-05-30 008 2005 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aPINEROS, M. A. 245 $aAluminum resistance in maize cannot be solely explained by root organic acid exudation. A comparative physiological study$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2005 520 $aRoot apical aluminum (Al) exclusion via Al-activated root citrate exudation is widely accepted as the main Al-resistance mechanism operating in maize (Zea mays) roots. Nonetheless, the correlation between Al resistance and this Al-exclusion mechanism has not been tested beyond a very small number of Al-resistant and Al-sensitive maize lines. In this study, we conducted a comparative study of the physiology of Al resistance using six different maize genotypes that capture the range of maize Al resistance and differ significantly in their genetic background (three Brazilian and three North American genotypes). In these maize lines, we were able to establish a clear correlation between root tip Al exclusion (based on root Al content) and Al resistance. Both Al-resistant genotypes and three of the four Al-sensitive lines exhibited a significant Al-activated citrate exudation, with no evidence for Al activation of root malate or phosphate release. There was a lack of correlation between differential Al resistance and root citrate exudation for the six maize genotypes; in fact, one of the Al-sensitive lines, Mo17, had the largest Al-activated citrate exudation of all of the maize lines. Our results indicate that although root organic acid release may play a role in maize Al resistance, it is clearly not the only or the main resistance mechanism operating in these maize roots. A number of other potential Al-resistance mechanisms were investigated, including release of other Al-chelating ligands, Al-induced alkalinization of rhizosphere pH, changes in internal levels of Al-chelating compounds in the root, and Al translocation to the shoot. However, we were unsuccessful in identifying additional Al-resistance mechanisms in maize. It is likely that a purely physiological approach may not be sufficient to identify these novel Al-resistance mechanisms in maize and this will require an interdisciplinary approach integrating genetic, molecular, and physiological investigations. 650 $aMilho 700 1 $aSHAFF, J. E. 700 1 $aMANSLANK, H. S. 700 1 $aALVES, V. M. C. 700 1 $aKOCHIAN, L. V. 773 $tPlant Physiology, Bethesda$gv. 137, n. 1, p. 231-241, 2005.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|