| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/08/1995 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/09/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Comunicado Técnico/Recomendações Técnicas |
|
Autoria: |
LANGUIDEY, P. H.; ARAUJO, E. C. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
PABLO HOENTSCH LANGUIDEY, EMBRPA UEPAE de Aracaju; EDVALDO CORREIA DE ARAUJO, EMBRAPA UEPAE de Aracaju. |
|
Título: |
Suplementação proteica e/ou energética para vacas em lactação, na região úmida do Estado de Sergipe. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1983 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Aracaju: EMBRAPA-UEPAE de Aracaju, 1983. |
|
Páginas: |
04p. |
|
Série: |
(EMBRAPA-UEPAE Aracaju. Comunicado Técnico, 10). |
|
ISSN: |
0100-4867 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Apesar da tecnologia existente e já disponível no país, o rebanho bovino traduz, sensivelmente, a sazonalidade da produção de forragens durante o ano. Isso tem obrigado, não raramente, o produtor, principalmente o de leite, a utilizar cada vez mais os concentrados na época seca, de modo a amenizar a alternância de períodos de safra e entressafra, cujo reflexo se deixa sentir, invariavelmente, todo ano na economia do produtor e do país. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Aracaju; Brasil; Energética; Feed crops; Gado de leite; Production; Protéica; Regiões Úmidas; Sergipe; Suplementacao; Suplementacao alimentar; Supplementary feeding; Supplements; Vacas. |
|
Thesagro: |
Alimentação; Alimentação Suplementar; Alimento Animal; Forragem; Gado Leiteiro; Lactação; Nutrição Animal; Produção; Produção Leiteira; Proteína; Suplemento Alimentar; Vaca Leiteira. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
animal feeding; animal nutrition; Beef; Brazil; dairy cattle; dairy cows; milk production; proteins. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/183047/1/Proteica.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01944nam a2200565 a 4500
001 1357210
005 2018-09-17
008 1983 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
022 $a0100-4867
100 1 $aLANGUIDEY, P. H.
245 $aSuplementação proteica e/ou energética para vacas em lactação, na região úmida do Estado de Sergipe.
260 $aAracaju: EMBRAPA-UEPAE de Aracaju$c1983
300 $a04p.
490 $a(EMBRAPA-UEPAE Aracaju. Comunicado Técnico, 10).
520 $aApesar da tecnologia existente e já disponível no país, o rebanho bovino traduz, sensivelmente, a sazonalidade da produção de forragens durante o ano. Isso tem obrigado, não raramente, o produtor, principalmente o de leite, a utilizar cada vez mais os concentrados na época seca, de modo a amenizar a alternância de períodos de safra e entressafra, cujo reflexo se deixa sentir, invariavelmente, todo ano na economia do produtor e do país.
650 $aanimal feeding
650 $aanimal nutrition
650 $aBeef
650 $aBrazil
650 $adairy cattle
650 $adairy cows
650 $amilk production
650 $aproteins
650 $aAlimentação
650 $aAlimentação Suplementar
650 $aAlimento Animal
650 $aForragem
650 $aGado Leiteiro
650 $aLactação
650 $aNutrição Animal
650 $aProdução
650 $aProdução Leiteira
650 $aProteína
650 $aSuplemento Alimentar
650 $aVaca Leiteira
653 $aAracaju
653 $aBrasil
653 $aEnergética
653 $aFeed crops
653 $aGado de leite
653 $aProduction
653 $aProtéica
653 $aRegiões Úmidas
653 $aSergipe
653 $aSuplementacao
653 $aSuplementacao alimentar
653 $aSupplementary feeding
653 $aSupplements
653 $aVacas
700 1 $aARAUJO, E. C. de
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros (CPATC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Cerrados. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpac.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados. |
|
Data corrente: |
05/05/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/05/2014 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
HUNGRIA, M.; MENDES, I. C.; NAKATANI, A. S.; REIS-JUNIOR, F. B. dos; MORAIS, J. Z.; OLIVEIRA, M. C. N. de; FERNANDES, M. F. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARIANGELA HUNGRIA DA CUNHA, CNPSO; IEDA DE CARVALHO MENDES, CPAC; ANDRÉ SHIGUEYOSHI NAKATANI, CNPq - pós-doutorado; FABIO BUENO DOS REIS JUNIOR, CPAC; JOSE ZUCCA MORAIS, CNPSO; MARIA CRISTINA NEVES DE OLIVEIRA, CNPSO; MARCELO FERREIRA FERNANDES, CPATC. |
|
Título: |
Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean: field trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Field Crops Research, v. 158, p. 43-54, 2014. |
|
DOI: |
10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.022 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The commercial use of glyphosate-resistant (also known as Roundup Ready®, GR or RR) soybean wasinitiated in 1996 in the United States. This genetically engineered crop now occupies 75.4 million haworldwide, 20.6 million of which are in Brazil where it occupies 86% of the total area cropped with thelegume. Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is critical for economic sustainability of soybean in Brazil;therefore, to investigate the effects of the RR gene?using pairs of nearly isogenic cultivars?and herbi-cides on BNF, we conducted an extensive series of field experiments for three cropping seasons. Theexperiments were set up at six sites with five treatments, three pairs of nearly isogenic cultivars, andsix replicates. The treatments consisted of: (T1) RR soybean + glyphosate; (T2) RR soybean + conventionalherbicides; (T3) conventional parental soybean + conventional herbicides; (T4) RR soybean + hand weedcontrol; and (T5) conventional parental soybean + hand weed control. Parameters of nodulation, plantbiomass production, total N and ureide-N were evaluated at the V4 and R2 stages of growth, and grainyield and total N in grains were evaluated at crop maturity. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, analysesof contrasts, and multivariate analyses considering a pool of six variables, denominated as symbioticefficiency (SyEf). The comparison of the pairs of non-transgenic and RR soybean cultivars showed thatthe transgenic trait negatively affected some BNF variables, but over a three-year period these effectshad no significant impact on soybean grain yield. No consistent differences between glyphosate andconventional herbicide application were observed on BNF-associated parameters. When compared toconventional soybean and conventional herbicides, weed-management strategy with RR soybean andglyphosate did not affect symbiotic efficiency. In addition, at three sites, grain yields increased in thetreatments with glyphosate and RR soybean over the three cropping seasons. The results from the multi-variate analyses indicate that BNF and yield parameters were more affected by location, cropping seasonand cultivar than by the transgene, herbicides, or weed-management strategy. Despite the lack of effectsof the transgene on yield in the three-year period, longer-term effects on BNF and N accumulation shouldbe monitored. MenosThe commercial use of glyphosate-resistant (also known as Roundup Ready®, GR or RR) soybean wasinitiated in 1996 in the United States. This genetically engineered crop now occupies 75.4 million haworldwide, 20.6 million of which are in Brazil where it occupies 86% of the total area cropped with thelegume. Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is critical for economic sustainability of soybean in Brazil;therefore, to investigate the effects of the RR gene?using pairs of nearly isogenic cultivars?and herbi-cides on BNF, we conducted an extensive series of field experiments for three cropping seasons. Theexperiments were set up at six sites with five treatments, three pairs of nearly isogenic cultivars, andsix replicates. The treatments consisted of: (T1) RR soybean + glyphosate; (T2) RR soybean + conventionalherbicides; (T3) conventional parental soybean + conventional herbicides; (T4) RR soybean + hand weedcontrol; and (T5) conventional parental soybean + hand weed control. Parameters of nodulation, plantbiomass production, total N and ureide-N were evaluated at the V4 and R2 stages of growth, and grainyield and total N in grains were evaluated at crop maturity. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, analysesof contrasts, and multivariate analyses considering a pool of six variables, denominated as symbioticefficiency (SyEf). The comparison of the pairs of non-transgenic and RR soybean cultivars showed thatthe transgenic trait negatively affected some BNF variables, but over a three-year ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Fixação de nitrogênio; Herbicida; Soja. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Herbicides; Nitrogen fixation; Soybeans. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03161naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1985572
005 2014-05-05
008 2014 bl --- 0-- u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.022$2DOI
100 1 $aHUNGRIA, M.
245 $aEffects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean$bfield trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield.
260 $c2014
520 $aThe commercial use of glyphosate-resistant (also known as Roundup Ready®, GR or RR) soybean wasinitiated in 1996 in the United States. This genetically engineered crop now occupies 75.4 million haworldwide, 20.6 million of which are in Brazil where it occupies 86% of the total area cropped with thelegume. Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is critical for economic sustainability of soybean in Brazil;therefore, to investigate the effects of the RR gene?using pairs of nearly isogenic cultivars?and herbi-cides on BNF, we conducted an extensive series of field experiments for three cropping seasons. Theexperiments were set up at six sites with five treatments, three pairs of nearly isogenic cultivars, andsix replicates. The treatments consisted of: (T1) RR soybean + glyphosate; (T2) RR soybean + conventionalherbicides; (T3) conventional parental soybean + conventional herbicides; (T4) RR soybean + hand weedcontrol; and (T5) conventional parental soybean + hand weed control. Parameters of nodulation, plantbiomass production, total N and ureide-N were evaluated at the V4 and R2 stages of growth, and grainyield and total N in grains were evaluated at crop maturity. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, analysesof contrasts, and multivariate analyses considering a pool of six variables, denominated as symbioticefficiency (SyEf). The comparison of the pairs of non-transgenic and RR soybean cultivars showed thatthe transgenic trait negatively affected some BNF variables, but over a three-year period these effectshad no significant impact on soybean grain yield. No consistent differences between glyphosate andconventional herbicide application were observed on BNF-associated parameters. When compared toconventional soybean and conventional herbicides, weed-management strategy with RR soybean andglyphosate did not affect symbiotic efficiency. In addition, at three sites, grain yields increased in thetreatments with glyphosate and RR soybean over the three cropping seasons. The results from the multi-variate analyses indicate that BNF and yield parameters were more affected by location, cropping seasonand cultivar than by the transgene, herbicides, or weed-management strategy. Despite the lack of effectsof the transgene on yield in the three-year period, longer-term effects on BNF and N accumulation shouldbe monitored.
650 $aHerbicides
650 $aNitrogen fixation
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aFixação de nitrogênio
650 $aHerbicida
650 $aSoja
700 1 $aMENDES, I. C.
700 1 $aNAKATANI, A. S.
700 1 $aREIS-JUNIOR, F. B. dos
700 1 $aMORAIS, J. Z.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, M. C. N. de
700 1 $aFERNANDES, M. F.
773 $tField Crops Research$gv. 158, p. 43-54, 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
