|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
Data corrente: |
10/03/1999 |
Data da última atualização: |
10/03/1999 |
Autoria: |
XAVIER, O. S. |
Afiliação: |
EMBRAPA-CNPMF. |
Título: |
Preservacao e utilizacao de recursos geneticos com enfase para banana |
Ano de publicação: |
1984 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Cruz das Almas: EMBRAPA-CNPMF, 1984 |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
Este trabalho baseia-se na Dissertacao de Mestrado da autora, restringindo-se, no entanto, a abordagem do clima organizacional, relacionado a motivacao e a insatisfacao no trabalho. Sao investigados os tipos de clima percebido e desejado em dez organizacoes de pesquisa agropecuaria (cinco unidades estaduais e cinco federais) e como eles variam segundo a posicao hierarquica dos membros organizacionais e a esfera administrativa a que pertencem as unidades de pesquisa. Os dados sao resultantes das percepcoes e aspiracoes de 30 Dirigentes, 37 Assistentes ou Assessores, 307 Pesquisadores e 194 Tecnicos de nivel medio, coletadas mediante um questionario de sete dimensoes. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Banana-genetica-uso. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 01017nam a2200121 a 4500 001 1638504 005 1999-03-10 008 1984 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aXAVIER, O. S. 245 $aPreservacao e utilizacao de recursos geneticos com enfase para banana 260 $aCruz das Almas: EMBRAPA-CNPMF$c1984 520 $aEste trabalho baseia-se na Dissertacao de Mestrado da autora, restringindo-se, no entanto, a abordagem do clima organizacional, relacionado a motivacao e a insatisfacao no trabalho. Sao investigados os tipos de clima percebido e desejado em dez organizacoes de pesquisa agropecuaria (cinco unidades estaduais e cinco federais) e como eles variam segundo a posicao hierarquica dos membros organizacionais e a esfera administrativa a que pertencem as unidades de pesquisa. Os dados sao resultantes das percepcoes e aspiracoes de 30 Dirigentes, 37 Assistentes ou Assessores, 307 Pesquisadores e 194 Tecnicos de nivel medio, coletadas mediante um questionario de sete dimensoes. 653 $aBanana-genetica-uso
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpaf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
Data corrente: |
30/09/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
30/09/2021 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
Autoria: |
WIESE, L.; WOLLENBERG, E.; ALCÁNTARA-SHIVAPATHAMC; RICHARDS, M.; SHELTON, S.; HÖNLE, S. E.; HEIDECKE, C.; MADARI, B. E.; CHENU, C. |
Afiliação: |
LIESL WIESE, INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND POLICY CONSULTANT, South Africa; EVA WOLLENBERG, CGIAR; VIRIDIANA ALCÁNTARA-SHIVAPATHAMC, FEDERAL OFFICE FOR AGRICULTURE AND FOOD, Germany; MERYL RICHARDS, CERES; SADIE SHELTON, CGIAR; SUSANNA ESTHER HÖNLE, THÜNEN INSTITUTE; CLAUDIA HEIDECKE, THÜNEN INSTITUTE; BEATA EMOKE MADARI, CNPAF; CLAIRE CHENU, AgroParis Tech. |
Título: |
Countries' commitments to soil organic carbon in nationally determined contributions. |
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Climate Policy, 2021. |
ISSN: |
1469-3062 |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1969883 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Soil carbon is the major active pool of terrestrial carbon, and as such, soil organic carbon (SOC) targets, policies and measures will be pivotal to achieving global climate targets. SOC sequestration may reduce the net annual greenhouse gas emissions from Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use by between 3% and 71%, while simultaneously supporting various ecosystem services. Accurate SOC accounting and monitoring, however, is constrained by various technical challenges related to indicators, rates of SOC change, measuring the impact of management practices on SOC, and the long-term persistence of sequestered SOC. We assessed countries' pledges to the Paris Agreement for SOC in agriculture to better understand the level, transparency, and specificity of commitments. Reviewing 184 countries' initial Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), we considered whether SOC was included, what was pledged, the level of ambition promised and the specificity of mitigation targets. Twenty-eight countries referred to SOC in their NDCs, citing quantified or unquantified mitigation targets, national policies or programs, and actions and measures to be implemented in agricultural lands (14), peatlands (6) or wetlands (14). Countries' reasons for not including SOC in NDCs included the need to prioritize goals of sustainable development and food security above climate mitigation, a lack of incentives for farmers to improve management practices, and the difficulty of accurately monitoring changes in SOC. Including SOC targets in NDCs can improve NDCs' comprehensiveness and transparency to track and compare policy progress across NDCs; it can also leverage SOC-related climate finance, technical support, and capacity building. MenosSoil carbon is the major active pool of terrestrial carbon, and as such, soil organic carbon (SOC) targets, policies and measures will be pivotal to achieving global climate targets. SOC sequestration may reduce the net annual greenhouse gas emissions from Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use by between 3% and 71%, while simultaneously supporting various ecosystem services. Accurate SOC accounting and monitoring, however, is constrained by various technical challenges related to indicators, rates of SOC change, measuring the impact of management practices on SOC, and the long-term persistence of sequestered SOC. We assessed countries' pledges to the Paris Agreement for SOC in agriculture to better understand the level, transparency, and specificity of commitments. Reviewing 184 countries' initial Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), we considered whether SOC was included, what was pledged, the level of ambition promised and the specificity of mitigation targets. Twenty-eight countries referred to SOC in their NDCs, citing quantified or unquantified mitigation targets, national policies or programs, and actions and measures to be implemented in agricultural lands (14), peatlands (6) or wetlands (14). Countries' reasons for not including SOC in NDCs included the need to prioritize goals of sustainable development and food security above climate mitigation, a lack of incentives for farmers to improve management practices, and the difficulty of accurately monitoring c... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Paris agreement; Policy. |
Thesagro: |
Carbono; Mudança Climática; Solo. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agriculture; Climate change; National Environmental Policy Act; Soil organic carbon. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
Marc: |
LEADER 02704naa a2200349 a 4500 001 2134919 005 2021-09-30 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1469-3062 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1969883$2DOI 100 1 $aWIESE, L. 245 $aCountries' commitments to soil organic carbon in nationally determined contributions.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 520 $aSoil carbon is the major active pool of terrestrial carbon, and as such, soil organic carbon (SOC) targets, policies and measures will be pivotal to achieving global climate targets. SOC sequestration may reduce the net annual greenhouse gas emissions from Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use by between 3% and 71%, while simultaneously supporting various ecosystem services. Accurate SOC accounting and monitoring, however, is constrained by various technical challenges related to indicators, rates of SOC change, measuring the impact of management practices on SOC, and the long-term persistence of sequestered SOC. We assessed countries' pledges to the Paris Agreement for SOC in agriculture to better understand the level, transparency, and specificity of commitments. Reviewing 184 countries' initial Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), we considered whether SOC was included, what was pledged, the level of ambition promised and the specificity of mitigation targets. Twenty-eight countries referred to SOC in their NDCs, citing quantified or unquantified mitigation targets, national policies or programs, and actions and measures to be implemented in agricultural lands (14), peatlands (6) or wetlands (14). Countries' reasons for not including SOC in NDCs included the need to prioritize goals of sustainable development and food security above climate mitigation, a lack of incentives for farmers to improve management practices, and the difficulty of accurately monitoring changes in SOC. Including SOC targets in NDCs can improve NDCs' comprehensiveness and transparency to track and compare policy progress across NDCs; it can also leverage SOC-related climate finance, technical support, and capacity building. 650 $aAgriculture 650 $aClimate change 650 $aNational Environmental Policy Act 650 $aSoil organic carbon 650 $aCarbono 650 $aMudança Climática 650 $aSolo 653 $aParis agreement 653 $aPolicy 700 1 $aWOLLENBERG, E. 700 1 $aALCÁNTARA-SHIVAPATHAMC 700 1 $aRICHARDS, M. 700 1 $aSHELTON, S. 700 1 $aHÖNLE, S. E. 700 1 $aHEIDECKE, C. 700 1 $aMADARI, B. E. 700 1 $aCHENU, C. 773 $tClimate Policy, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|