|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
Data corrente: |
01/08/1992 |
Data da última atualização: |
02/01/2024 |
Autoria: |
MUDGAL, V. D.; SENGAR, S. S. |
Título: |
Effect of feeding protected and unprotected protein on the growth rate and body composition of goats. |
Ano de publicação: |
1980 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Nuclear Agriculture and Biology, v. 9, n. 1, p. 19-25, 1980. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Twenty kids were divided in 4 groups of each. Each group was fed on different diet as follows: (i) Control (untreated groundnut cake), (ii) Formaldehyde treated ration, (iii) Heat treatment, and (iv) Tannic acid treatment. The effect of protection of feed protein was studied in terms of dry matter intake, feed utilization, nitrogen balances, feed conversion efficiency and body composition. No significant difference was observed in dry matter intake and the digestibility coefficients of various feed nutrients in different groups. However, the formaldehyde treatment ration fed group showed significantly higher (P < 0.05) balance for nitrogen. The average daily gain in body weights were 49.06 +- 2.7, 71.92 +- 3.95, 52.20 +- 1.63 and 55.75 +- 2.25g in control, formaldehyde, heat and tannic acid treatment group, respectively. The difference in daily gain was highly significant (P < 0.01) between different treatments. The average values of TOH percent space of body weight were 77.59 +- 1.26, 76.85 +- 0.41, 77.15 +- 0.70 and 77.00 +- 1.58 in control, formaldehyde, heat and tannic acid treatment group, respectively. The average values of fat percentage in control, formaldehyde, heat and tannic acid groups were 8.62 +- 1.32, 9.32 +- 0.41, 9.08 +- 0.71 and 9.14 +- 1.66 respectively. The corresponding values for protein contents were 15.82 +- 0.17, 15.68 +- 0.07, 15.97 +- 0.10 and 15.75 +- 0.22, respectively. No significant difference in TOH space or body composition was noted due to treatment. MenosTwenty kids were divided in 4 groups of each. Each group was fed on different diet as follows: (i) Control (untreated groundnut cake), (ii) Formaldehyde treated ration, (iii) Heat treatment, and (iv) Tannic acid treatment. The effect of protection of feed protein was studied in terms of dry matter intake, feed utilization, nitrogen balances, feed conversion efficiency and body composition. No significant difference was observed in dry matter intake and the digestibility coefficients of various feed nutrients in different groups. However, the formaldehyde treatment ration fed group showed significantly higher (P < 0.05) balance for nitrogen. The average daily gain in body weights were 49.06 +- 2.7, 71.92 +- 3.95, 52.20 +- 1.63 and 55.75 +- 2.25g in control, formaldehyde, heat and tannic acid treatment group, respectively. The difference in daily gain was highly significant (P < 0.01) between different treatments. The average values of TOH percent space of body weight were 77.59 +- 1.26, 76.85 +- 0.41, 77.15 +- 0.70 and 77.00 +- 1.58 in control, formaldehyde, heat and tannic acid treatment group, respectively. The average values of fat percentage in control, formaldehyde, heat and tannic acid groups were 8.62 +- 1.32, 9.32 +- 0.41, 9.08 +- 0.71 and 9.14 +- 1.66 respectively. The corresponding values for protein contents were 15.82 +- 0.17, 15.68 +- 0.07, 15.97 +- 0.10 and 15.75 +- 0.22, respectively. No significant difference in TOH space or body composition was noted due to t... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Heat treatmenst; Nutricao proteica; Tannic acid. |
Thesagro: |
Caprino; Crescimento. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Animal feeding; Animal growth; Body composition; Body weight; Chemical composition; Digestion; Excretion; Feed intake; Formaldehyde; Goats; Nitrogen; Ruminant nutrition; Tracer techniques. |
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
Marc: |
LEADER 02468naa a2200349 a 4500 001 1519654 005 2024-01-02 008 1980 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aMUDGAL, V. D. 245 $aEffect of feeding protected and unprotected protein on the growth rate and body composition of goats. 260 $c1980 520 $aTwenty kids were divided in 4 groups of each. Each group was fed on different diet as follows: (i) Control (untreated groundnut cake), (ii) Formaldehyde treated ration, (iii) Heat treatment, and (iv) Tannic acid treatment. The effect of protection of feed protein was studied in terms of dry matter intake, feed utilization, nitrogen balances, feed conversion efficiency and body composition. No significant difference was observed in dry matter intake and the digestibility coefficients of various feed nutrients in different groups. However, the formaldehyde treatment ration fed group showed significantly higher (P < 0.05) balance for nitrogen. The average daily gain in body weights were 49.06 +- 2.7, 71.92 +- 3.95, 52.20 +- 1.63 and 55.75 +- 2.25g in control, formaldehyde, heat and tannic acid treatment group, respectively. The difference in daily gain was highly significant (P < 0.01) between different treatments. The average values of TOH percent space of body weight were 77.59 +- 1.26, 76.85 +- 0.41, 77.15 +- 0.70 and 77.00 +- 1.58 in control, formaldehyde, heat and tannic acid treatment group, respectively. The average values of fat percentage in control, formaldehyde, heat and tannic acid groups were 8.62 +- 1.32, 9.32 +- 0.41, 9.08 +- 0.71 and 9.14 +- 1.66 respectively. The corresponding values for protein contents were 15.82 +- 0.17, 15.68 +- 0.07, 15.97 +- 0.10 and 15.75 +- 0.22, respectively. No significant difference in TOH space or body composition was noted due to treatment. 650 $aAnimal feeding 650 $aAnimal growth 650 $aBody composition 650 $aBody weight 650 $aChemical composition 650 $aDigestion 650 $aExcretion 650 $aFeed intake 650 $aFormaldehyde 650 $aGoats 650 $aNitrogen 650 $aRuminant nutrition 650 $aTracer techniques 650 $aCaprino 650 $aCrescimento 653 $aHeat treatmenst 653 $aNutricao proteica 653 $aTannic acid 700 1 $aSENGAR, S. S. 773 $tJournal of Nuclear Agriculture and Biology$gv. 9, n. 1, p. 19-25, 1980.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
Data corrente: |
04/10/1994 |
Data da última atualização: |
28/03/2024 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
Nacional - B |
Autoria: |
BORKERT, C. M.; YORINORI, J. T.; CORREA-FERREIRA, B. S.; ALMEIDA, A. M. R.; FERREIRA, L. P.; SFREDO, G. J. |
Afiliação: |
EMBRAPA-CNPSo. Londrina, PR. |
Título: |
Seja o doutor da sua soja. |
Ano de publicação: |
1994 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Informacoes Agronomicas, Piracicaba, n. 66, p. 1-16, jun. 1994. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Notas: |
Encarte: Arquivo do Agronomo, n.5. |
Conteúdo: |
Programa de correcao da fertilidade do solo e de adubacao da soja; Sintomas de deficiencia e de toxicidade de nutrientes na soja; Praticas para a correcao e a manutencao da fertilidade do solo; Pragas diagnostico e controle; Pragas principais; Pragas secundarias; Inimigos naturais; Controle; Doencas da soja e seu controle; Doencas fungicas; Principais doencas e medidas de controle; Doencas causadas por nematoides. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Acidez no solo cerrado; Brasil; Chrysodeixis includens; Colletotrichum dematium var; Deficiencia de nutrientes; Deficiency; Diaporthe phaseolorum meridionalis; Disease; Fertilidade solo; Fertilization; meridionalis; Nematode; Nutrient; Pest; Phomopsis phaseoli f; Soybean; sp; truncata. |
Thesagro: |
Adubação; Anticarsia Gemmatalis; Cercospora Kikuchii; Cercospora Sojina; Doença; Epinotia Aporema; Euschistus Heros; Nematóide; Nezara Viridula; Phomopsis Sojae; Piezodorus Guildinii; Praga; Septoria Glycines; Soja; Sternechus Subsignatus. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
acidity; Brazil; soil fertility. |
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
Marc: |
LEADER 02076naa a2200625 a 4500 001 1444768 005 2024-03-28 008 1994 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aBORKERT, C. M. 245 $aSeja o doutor da sua soja.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c1994 500 $aEncarte: Arquivo do Agronomo, n.5. 520 $aPrograma de correcao da fertilidade do solo e de adubacao da soja; Sintomas de deficiencia e de toxicidade de nutrientes na soja; Praticas para a correcao e a manutencao da fertilidade do solo; Pragas diagnostico e controle; Pragas principais; Pragas secundarias; Inimigos naturais; Controle; Doencas da soja e seu controle; Doencas fungicas; Principais doencas e medidas de controle; Doencas causadas por nematoides. 650 $aacidity 650 $aBrazil 650 $asoil fertility 650 $aAdubação 650 $aAnticarsia Gemmatalis 650 $aCercospora Kikuchii 650 $aCercospora Sojina 650 $aDoença 650 $aEpinotia Aporema 650 $aEuschistus Heros 650 $aNematóide 650 $aNezara Viridula 650 $aPhomopsis Sojae 650 $aPiezodorus Guildinii 650 $aPraga 650 $aSeptoria Glycines 650 $aSoja 650 $aSternechus Subsignatus 653 $aAcidez no solo cerrado 653 $aBrasil 653 $aChrysodeixis includens 653 $aColletotrichum dematium var 653 $aDeficiencia de nutrientes 653 $aDeficiency 653 $aDiaporthe phaseolorum meridionalis 653 $aDisease 653 $aFertilidade solo 653 $aFertilization 653 $ameridionalis 653 $aNematode 653 $aNutrient 653 $aPest 653 $aPhomopsis phaseoli f 653 $aSoybean 653 $asp 653 $atruncata 700 1 $aYORINORI, J. T. 700 1 $aCORREA-FERREIRA, B. S. 700 1 $aALMEIDA, A. M. R. 700 1 $aFERREIRA, L. P. 700 1 $aSFREDO, G. J. 773 $tInformacoes Agronomicas, Piracicaba$gn. 66, p. 1-16, jun. 1994.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|